Skip to main content
Mental Health

January 2025 Hot Topic: Loneliness, Epigenetics, and Accelerated Aging

Reading Time: 4 minutes
Written on: January 2, 2025
By Machell Collier, MS
Senior Marketing and Clinical Content Specialist, IFM

 

Healthy aging is top of mind for many patients, and it is well known that modifiable lifestyle factors such as diet and exercise play a significant role in wellness and optimizing longevity. Continuing research also emphasizes the importance of maintaining social connections and supportive relationships to improve overall health and extend life expectancy.1,2 In fact, loneliness has been identified as a pervasive public health concern worldwide, significantly associated with increased mortality risk.3,4 Now, recent studies are adding more details about how loneliness impacts physiology at a genetic level and may contribute to accelerated aging.5,6

Accelerated Aging & The Loneliness Factor

Global prevalence of loneliness has most recently been estimated at 26% overall, with approximately three out of ten adults over the age of 60 feeling lonely7 and an estimated prevalence of perceived loneliness among adolescents at 10.7% worldwide.8 Reflecting similar statistics, US-based 2024 polls report:

  • One out of five adults experience daily feelings of loneliness.9
  • An estimated 33% of older adults feel lonely some of the time or often.10
  • 30% of young adults aged 18 to 34 feel lonely every day or several times a week.11

In addition to increased risk of mortality, loneliness has also been associated with an increased risk of developing health conditions such as heart disease, stroke, type 2 diabetes,12,13 and mild cognitive impairment.14 Researchers continue to clarify the physiological mechanisms involved with loneliness and its health impacts. To investigate how feeling lonely influences inflammatory, immunological, and age-related processes, two 2024 studies explored the connection between loneliness, DNA-methylation (DNAm), and epigenetic changes.5,6 

In the 2024 Beam et al study, participants included 169 same-sex, adult-aged twins (aged 32-65 years) from the longitudinal Louisville Twin Study that started in 1957, measuring participants’ physical, cognitive, and psychosocial development.5 Investigators used whole blood samples and self-reported psychosocial questionnaires to assess loneliness levels and corresponding DNAm levels found at DNAm-specific sites across the human genome. They also tested the links between loneliness levels and six measures of DNAm age (i.e., epigenetic clocks).5 Investigators reported that:5

  • Among the 837,274 sites analyzed, 25 suggestive sites were flagged because their DNAm levels increased with higher loneliness scores. Further analysis found that the 25 suggestive sites were associated with overexpressed genes in a mixture of biological processes and molecular functions, including inflammatory responses, metabolic processes, and oxygen delivery.
  • Links between loneliness and DNAm age acceleration measures were small across all six epigenetic clocks. The statistically significant association was seen with the DunedinPACE clock, which specifically assesses how someone is aging across organ systems compared to their chronological age. Data from this clock suggested that among this population, higher levels of loneliness were significantly associated with higher average rates of physiological changes per year (i.e., accelerated epigenetic aging).

In the 2024 Freilich et al study, investigators explored associations between loneliness, epigenetic age acceleration, and multimorbidity later in life.6 Participants were from the Health and Retirement Study (n=4,018 US adults) who had provided blood draws, consented to DNAm assays, and completed loneliness and chronic disease assessments. Five different epigenetic clocks were used to assess methylation profiles and measure epigenetic age acceleration. The investigators reported the following:6

  • A small, nominally positive association was seen between epigenetic age measurements and loneliness. However, loneliness did not fully reach statistical significance as a predictor of epigenetic age acceleration.
  • Both loneliness scores and epigenetic age measurements predicted increasing chronic condition counts (i.e., multimorbidity). In addition, the measurement of DNAm levels using the GrimAge clock showed significant epigenetic mediation of loneliness-multimorbidity associations.

While both studies did not report overwhelming statistically significant findings, their results support and expand previous research, not only emphasizing the importance of social connection for healthy aging but highlighting additional avenues for further investigation into the mechanisms of loneliness and its influence on DNAm. As research continues to identify modifiable lifestyle factors including quality family and social relationships as protective factors for loneliness across the lifespan,15,16 functional medicine clinicians continue to recognize the importance of these supportive relationships in a patient’s personalized therapeutic strategy and overall health journey.

References       
  1. Gronewold J, Kropp R, Lehmann N, et al. Association of social relationships with incident cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Heart. 2020;106(17):1317-1323. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2019-316250
  2. Wang Y, Wang JJ, Zhou HF, et al. The protective effect of social support on all-cause and cardio-cerebrovascular mortality among middle-aged and older adults in the US. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):4758. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-55012-w
  3. Wang F, Gao Y, Han Z, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 90 cohort studies of social isolation, loneliness and mortality. Nat Hum Behav. 2023;7(8):1307-1319. doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01617-6
  4. Barnes TL, Ahuja M, MacLeod S, et al. Loneliness, social isolation, and all-cause mortality in a large sample of older adults. J Aging Health. 2022;34(6-8):883-892. doi:10.1177/08982643221074857
  5. Beam CR, Bakulski KM, Zandi E, et al. Epigenome-wide association study of loneliness in a sample of U.S. middle-aged twins. Epigenetics. 2024;19(1):2427999. doi:10.1080/15592294.2024.2427999
  6. Freilich CD, Markon KE, Mann FD, Cole SW, Krueger RF. Associations between loneliness, epigenetic aging, and multimorbidity through older adulthood. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2024;79(12):gbae169. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbae169
  7. Susanty S, Nadirawati N, Setiawan A, et al. Overview of the prevalence of loneliness and associated risk factors among older adults across six continents: a meta-analysis. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2025;128:105627. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2024.105627
  8. Smith L, López Sánchez GF, Pizzol D, et al. Global time trends of perceived loneliness among adolescents from 28 countries in Africa, Asia, and the Americas. J Affect Disord. 2024;346:192-199. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2023.11.032
  9. James MP, Witters D. Daily loneliness afflicts one in five in US. Gallup. Published October 15, 2024. Accessed December 19, 2024. https://news.gallup.com/poll/651881/daily-loneliness-afflicts-one-five.aspx
  10. Malani PN, Solway E, Kirch M, Singer DC, Roberts JS, Kullgren JT. Loneliness and social isolation among US older adults. JAMA. Published online December 9, 2024. doi:10.1001/jama.2024.23213
  11. New APA poll: one in three Americans feels lonely every week. American Psychiatric Association. Published January 30, 2024. Accessed December 19, 2024. https://www.psychiatry.org/news-room/news-releases/new-apa-poll-one-in-three-americans-feels-lonely-e#:~:text=Younger%20people%20were%20more%20likely,22%25). 
  12. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Health effects of social isolation and loneliness. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Published May 15, 2024. Accessed December 19, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/social-connectedness/risk-factors/index.html
  13. Ding L, Dai R, Qian J, et al. Psycho-social dimensions of cardiovascular risk: exploring the impact of social isolation and loneliness in middle-aged and older adults. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):2355. doi:10.1186/s12889-024-19885-w
  14. Fan K, Seah B, Lu Z, Wang T, Zhou Y. Association between loneliness and mild cognitive impairment in older adults: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Aging Ment Health. 2024;28(12):1650-1658. doi:10.1080/13607863.2024.2358079
  15. Antonelli-Salgado T, Montezano BB, Roza TH, et al. Clinical and lifestyle predictors of loneliness: a two-year longitudinal study. J Psychiatr Res. 2024;180:482-488. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.11.025
  16. Buecker S, Petersen K, Neuber A, Zheng Y, Hayes D, Qualter P. A systematic review of longitudinal risk and protective factors for loneliness in youth. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2024;1542(1):620-637. doi:10.1111/nyas.15266